The Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) faces a critical decision following the recent developments in college football. After Miami's second ACC loss over Thanksgiving weekend against Syracuse, the conference found itself in a precarious position regarding the new 12-team College Football Playoff. With SMU maintaining an undefeated record of 8-0, Clemson capitalized on Miami’s setback and secured a spot as SMU’s opponent in the ACC Championship Game on December 7th in Charlotte. This pivotal moment set the stage for further discussions within the ACC.

Clemson managed to secure an unexpected victory over SMU with a last-second field goal, earning the automatic bid for the conference. Despite this win, questions arose about the inclusion of SMU in the expanded playoff field, especially after their dominant regular season performance. Ultimately, both teams were included, but this outcome has sparked debate within the ACC about the structure of their championship game.

ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips is now contemplating significant changes to the format of the conference championship. According to ESPN reporter Andrea Adelson, Phillips plans to discuss potential modifications with coaches and athletic directors. One proposal under consideration involves giving the regular season champion a bye while having the second and third-place teams compete in the championship game. This idea stems from comments by SMU coach Rhett Lashlee, who suggested that his team might have been better off not playing in the title game to secure a playoff berth.

Phillips’ suggestion raises eyebrows and invites skepticism. The commissioner acknowledged the importance of making championship games meaningful, proposing a scenario where the top team is sidelined while others compete. This concept, however, has been met with criticism, labeled as overly complicated and potentially damaging to the conference’s reputation. Critics argue that such a move could further undermine the ACC’s standing compared to other major conferences like the SEC, Big Ten, and Big 12.

As the ACC contemplates these radical changes, the future of its championship game hangs in the balance. The conference must weigh the benefits of innovation against the risk of alienating fans and critics alike. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether these proposals gain traction or if the ACC opts for a more traditional approach to its postseason structure.