Recent years have seen a growing acknowledgment of neurodivergent artists across various platforms, yet the discourse surrounding their work often falls short. Despite increased visibility, there remains an underlying issue in how these creators and their contributions are perceived. One recent incident involved the swift removal of a review from ArtsHub, which highlighted a specific exhibition at Arts Project Australia (APA). This event sparked necessary discussions—not only about editorial integrity but also regarding the art world's discomfort when engaging with disabled artists. Too frequently, coverage succumbs to simplistic narratives, focusing excessively on personal details rather than the artistic merit.

Since joining APA as its Executive Director, I have consistently observed this pattern. For half a century, APA has championed neurodivergent artists, prioritizing artistic excellence over therapeutic approaches. Yet, even within supportive environments, conversations tend to revolve more around inclusion than the actual aesthetic or conceptual depth of the artwork. Curatorial essays, reviews, and public dialogues frequently overlook the intrinsic qualities of the pieces, instead framing them through the lens of societal integration. This approach not only diminishes the artists' achievements but also undermines the critical importance of their contributions to contemporary art.

Moving forward requires rethinking traditional frameworks. The art world must embrace new ways of discussing these practices that align closely with the artists' creative processes and intentions. As Tiarney Miekus articulated in Art Guide Australia, there is a pressing need for fresh aesthetic language to capture the unique individuality of APA artists. It is insufficient merely to celebrate; we must critically engage with these artists' work. They are integral to art history, deserving equal scrutiny and recognition as any other artist. Achieving this necessitates overcoming structural barriers that marginalize disabled artists. While milestones exist—such as TarraWarra Museum of Art’s current exhibition showcasing APA artists—the broader art community still lags behind. By committing to acquiring and presenting works by disabled artists, institutions can redefine historical narratives and foster inclusive spaces where diverse audiences feel valued.

Transforming perceptions involves active participation from all stakeholders. Curators, critics, and institutions must transcend conventional dichotomies and deeply engage with neurodivergent artists. Galleries should integrate divergent voices into their core collections and programming. Writers need innovative approaches to articulate the significance of these artworks. Ultimately, the art world must dismantle ingrained biases rather than superficially signaling inclusivity. The success of exhibitions like Devoted to You lies not just in featuring disabled artists but in presenting compelling, rigorous work that enriches contemporary discourse. Recognizing the lasting impact and influence of these artists' contributions will pave the way toward genuine equity and respect in the art world.