The Berkshire Hills Regional School District, serving Great Barrington, Stockbridge, and West Stockbridge, has proposed a fiscal 2026 budget of $37.5 million, marking a significant increase from the current year. This budget hike has sparked discussions on funding formulas, tuition agreements, and potential impacts on local taxpayers. Finance Committee member Milena Cerna raised concerns about the district's subsidy for out-of-district students and the financial burden on residents. Superintendent Peter Dillon acknowledged these challenges, highlighting the complexities of renegotiating contracts and the uncertain federal funding landscape.

Addressing Concerns Over Tuition and Funding Formulas

The proposed budget includes substantial increases for each town within the district. Great Barrington faces an assessment rise of $1.36 million, while Stockbridge and West Stockbridge also see notable increases. Cerna questioned the district's funding formula, pointing out that the cost per student in Great Barrington is around $28,000, but the tuition received from other towns is significantly lower. She emphasized the need to address this disparity, as it places a heavy financial strain on local taxpayers.

Dillon explained that the district has existing agreements with Richmond Consolidated School District and Farmington River Regional School District, which provide tuitioned and school-choice students. He noted that while progress has been made in increasing rates over the years, there remains a considerable gap between the actual costs and the tuition received. Dillon agreed with Cerna’s concerns and expressed the intention to push for higher payments during future negotiations. However, he cautioned that rapid increases could lead to sending towns opting out, emphasizing the delicate balance involved in these discussions.

Navigating Federal Funding Uncertainty and Budget Constraints

Finance Committee Chair Philip Orenstein inquired about the district’s preparedness for potential reductions in federal funding. Dillon acknowledged the unpredictable federal landscape but assured that key areas like special education, Title I funding, and meal programs remain relatively secure. Despite his optimism, Dillon admitted to some nervousness regarding future developments. The district is closely monitoring executive orders and memos to ensure stability in critical funding areas.

Selectboard member Eric Gabriel explored possibilities to delay certain budget items to avoid a Proposition 2½ override. Dillon highlighted the challenge, noting that approximately 80% of the budget is tied to staff and benefits, leaving little room for cuts. He stressed that even minor adjustments would not sufficiently alleviate the financial pressure. The discussion underscored the complex interplay between maintaining educational quality and managing limited resources, reflecting the broader financial challenges faced by the district.