The world of boxing has long been a stage for intense physical battles, but the discussion around extending championship bouts back to 15 rounds has reignited a heated debate. This controversial topic dates back to 1982 when Duk Koo Kim tragically lost his life following a grueling match against Ray Mancini in the final round. The World Boxing Association (WBA) subsequently decided to limit title fights to 12 rounds, a decision that was eventually adopted by other organizations. Recent statements from WBA President Gilberto Mendoza have once again brought this issue into the spotlight, prompting strong reactions from influential figures like Turki Alalshikh.

In the early 1980s, boxing witnessed a significant shift in regulations due to a tragic incident. The last 15-round fight occurred in 1982, culminating in a devastating outcome when Duk Koo Kim suffered fatal injuries after being knocked out by Ray Mancini. This event prompted the WBA to reevaluate the safety of fighters, leading to the implementation of a 12-round limit for championship matches. Medical studies indicated that prolonged exposure to combat could result in severe brain trauma, making those additional three rounds particularly hazardous.

The transition to shorter fights faced resistance from traditionalists who cherished the endurance and drama of longer bouts. However, over time, the boxing community gradually adapted to the new format. Fast forward to today, Gilberto Mendoza’s recent suggestion about reverting to 15 rounds has stirred considerable controversy. Many industry insiders, including Turki Alalshikh, have expressed strong opposition. Alalshikh, a prominent figure in boxing, emphasized the potential health risks associated with extended fights, stating that even 12 rounds might be excessive for boxers' well-being. He firmly believes that returning to 15 rounds would be unacceptable.

Turki Alalshikh's stance highlights a broader concern within the sport. While fans may enjoy the spectacle of longer matches, the paramount importance lies in ensuring the safety of the athletes. The idea of increasing the number of rounds raises questions about the balance between tradition and modern health considerations. As the debate continues, it is crucial to prioritize the welfare of those who step into the ring. The hope remains that decisions will be made with the utmost regard for their health and safety.