The newly expanded 12-team College Football Playoff (CFP) has sparked debate among fans and experts, particularly concerning the selection process. Top conference champions automatically qualify for the playoff, with the top four teams receiving first-round byes. However, this format has led to unexpected outcomes, such as No. 1 Oregon, No. 2 Georgia, No. 3 Boise State, and No. 4 Arizona State all being eliminated in the quarterfinals. Despite calls for reform, ESPN analyst Heather Dinich suggests that significant changes are unlikely due to the unanimous approval required from all parties involved. SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey has expressed interest in adapting the system but acknowledges that any modifications would need broad consensus.

The Current CFP Format and Its Challenges

The existing playoff structure presents several challenges, especially in terms of team selection and seeding. The automatic qualification for top conference champions and the provision of byes to the top four teams have resulted in surprising eliminations early in the tournament. This has raised questions about the fairness and effectiveness of the current setup. ESPN's Heather Dinich points out that altering this system is a complex process, requiring unanimous agreement from all stakeholders, including representatives from smaller conferences like the Mountain West. Given the current dynamics, it seems unlikely that substantial changes will occur soon.

The controversy surrounding the CFP format stems from its unique structure, which grants automatic bids to top conference champions and provides byes to the highest-ranked teams. This arrangement has led to some powerhouse programs, such as Oregon, Georgia, Boise State, and Arizona State, being knocked out in the quarterfinals. Critics argue that this undermines the integrity of the competition. Dinich emphasizes that any changes would require unanimous consent from all involved parties, including commissioners from both major and smaller conferences. She notes that smaller schools, like Boise State, benefit from the current system, making it difficult to garner support for alterations. Moreover, the reduction of the Power Five to Power Four following the Pac-12's decline adds another layer of complexity to the discussion.

Potential Future Adjustments and Stakeholder Perspectives

While immediate changes seem improbable, there is growing interest in adapting the CFP format for future seasons. SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey has voiced his support for potential modifications, particularly regarding team seeding. However, he acknowledges that achieving consensus among all 10 FBS conferences and Notre Dame is a formidable task. The current contract for the 12-team playoff only extends through 2025, leaving room for adjustments in 2026. Sankey believes that learning from past experiences can inform necessary adaptations to ensure a more competitive and fair playoff structure.

Sankey highlights the historical context of the CFP format, noting that it was established when the Power Five still existed. The dissolution of the Pac-12 has altered the landscape, prompting discussions on how to maintain a balanced and equitable system. He stresses the importance of continuous evaluation and adaptation to address emerging issues. Sankey also mentions that while conversations about adapting the format are ongoing, significant changes for the next season are unlikely without unanimous agreement. Ultimately, the goal is to create a playoff system that reflects the evolving nature of college football and ensures a fair competition for all participants.