A 34-year-old former executive from a South Carolina nonprofit organization is scheduled to appear in court after pleading guilty to misusing government funds. Ashley Ingram, previously the Director of Finance and Operations at Habitat for Humanity of Central South Carolina, will be sentenced at the Matthew J. Perry Federal Courthouse on Tuesday afternoon. The Department of Justice has revealed that Ingram obtained checks from the U.S. Treasury by applying for an employee retention tax credit during the pandemic. These funds were intended to support businesses in maintaining their workforce during challenging economic times. However, Ingram diverted approximately $388,000 into personal accounts, totaling around $514,672 in misappropriated funds from both the organization and the federal government. Prior to her sentencing, Ingram submitted a plea for probation and home detention, citing emotional distress following significant family losses.

Ingram's actions unfolded during a period of immense personal turmoil. After losing her father and grandmother in 2020, she found herself under intense pressure to provide for her family. Her responsibilities extended beyond her professional duties, as she also had to adapt to new roles within her household. The stress was compounded by financial instability when her family transitioned from a two-income household to relying on a single income. In a heartfelt letter to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, Ingram explained the emotional challenges she faced during this time. She expressed regret for her actions and requested leniency in her sentence, emphasizing her lack of prior criminal history.

Supporters of Ingram have also reached out to the court, advocating for a more compassionate sentence. Multiple individuals wrote letters to Judge Lewis, highlighting Ingram's character and the absence of any previous legal issues. They argued that these factors should be considered when determining her punishment. Despite these appeals, Ingram faces a potential maximum sentence of ten years in prison, along with a fine of up to $250,000 and the obligation to make restitution. Before her involvement with Habitat for Humanity, Ingram had worked for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of South Carolina, adding another layer to her professional background.

The case underscores the complexities of balancing personal and professional responsibilities, especially during periods of heightened stress. While Ingram's actions have led her to face serious legal consequences, her supporters continue to stand by her, hoping for a fair outcome. As the court prepares to deliver its verdict, the community remains closely watching the developments in this ongoing story.