In a recent development, the Indian opposition party Congress has challenged the government's stance on USAID funding. Led by Jairam Ramesh, Congress highlighted discrepancies in the government’s claims regarding the purpose of USAID projects in India. The controversy erupted following assertions made by the DOGE and statements from former US President Donald Trump about a $21 million grant aimed at boosting voter turnout. However, the finance ministry's annual report for 2023-24 reveals that the seven ongoing USAID projects focus on areas like agriculture, climate adaptation, and health, with no connection to voter participation. This revelation has sparked debates over transparency and accountability in international aid.
Congress Leader Jairam Ramesh Challenges Government Claims on USAID Projects
In the vibrant and bustling capital of New Delhi, a significant political stir unfolded as Congress leader Jairam Ramesh took to social media platform X to challenge the government's narrative on USAID funding. According to Ramesh, the Union finance ministry's report for the fiscal year 2023-24 exposed inconsistencies in the government's claims. He emphasized that the seven USAID projects, totaling approximately $750 million, were unrelated to voter turnout. Instead, these projects focused on critical sectors such as agriculture, forest and climate adaptation, water and sanitation, renewable energy, health, and disaster management.
Ramesh's post came in response to earlier controversies surrounding the alleged cancellation of a $21 million grant by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) led by Elon Musk. Former US President Donald Trump had previously claimed that under Joe Biden's administration, USAID allocated funds for voter turnout initiatives in India, labeling it a "kickback scheme." External Affairs Minister S Jaishanker addressed these claims, stating that the information was concerning and under investigation. He reiterated that USAID was permitted in India "in good faith" to undertake beneficial activities.
The finance ministry's report detailed the allocation of $97 million in 2023-24 for the seven USAID projects. These projects have been consistent over the years, with similar amounts allocated in previous fiscal years. Since 1951, the US has provided $17 billion in bilateral development assistance through USAID, supporting 555 projects across various sectors over 73 years.
From a journalist's perspective, this controversy underscores the importance of transparency and accurate reporting in international aid. It highlights the need for clear communication between governments and donors to prevent misunderstandings and misinformation. The debate also emphasizes the role of opposition parties in holding the government accountable, ensuring that public funds are used effectively and transparently. Such scrutiny fosters trust and integrity in governance, ultimately benefiting the nation's development efforts.