In a recent episode of his provocative Instagram podcast, Clapback Thursday, Oscar de la Hoya turned his attention to Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez. The former champion and current owner of Golden Boy Promotions expressed strong disapproval of Canelo’s decision to sign a four-fight contract with Arab sheikh Turki Alalshikh for bouts in the Middle East over the next two years. De la Hoya also criticized Canelo’s choice of opponent for his upcoming May fight, Cuban William Scull, who holds the IBF super middleweight title but lacks significant recognition. De la Hoya suggested that Canelo is now more focused on financial gains rather than delivering high-profile matches that fans desire.

Canelo Alvarez’s Strategic Career Moves Under Scrutiny

De la Hoya emphasized that Canelo’s career trajectory has shifted towards prioritizing lucrative contracts over fan-pleasing matchups. He pointed out that Canelo consistently avoids challenging opponents like David Benavidez, who many consider a formidable rival. According to De la Hoya, this strategy reflects a growing trend in boxing where fighters prioritize financial rewards over competitive integrity. This shift has raised concerns among fans and industry insiders alike.

Golden Boy Promotions' founder further elaborated on how Canelo’s recent decisions have affected the sport. By signing with multiple promoters and focusing on high-paying contracts, Canelo has steered clear of potential blockbuster fights. De la Hoya argued that such choices undermine the excitement and unpredictability that once defined boxing. He highlighted that true champions should aim to elevate their opponents, as seen in historic matchups involving legends like himself, Manny Pacquiao, and Floyd Mayweather. Instead, Canelo seems to be fostering an era where financial gain takes precedence over sporting glory.

The Breakdown of Professional Relationships and Loyalty

De la Hoya reflected on the emotional impact of Canelo’s departure from Golden Boy Promotions in 2020. He admitted feeling hurt by the abrupt end of their professional relationship, noting that Canelo’s actions were driven by a desire for higher financial returns rather than loyalty. De la Hoya observed that this pattern of behavior has repeated itself with other prominent figures in boxing, including Eddie Hearn and Al Haymon. This lack of loyalty, according to De la Hoya, reveals a deeper issue within the sport.

He also addressed Canelo’s justifications for avoiding certain opponents, particularly David Benavidez. Canelo has cited personal grievances and provocations from Benavidez as reasons for not engaging in a match. However, De la Hoya dismissed these explanations, labeling them as diva-like attitudes. He contended that Canelo’s behavior has set a negative precedent in boxing, encouraging other fighters to prioritize personal comfort and financial incentives over competitive spirit. De la Hoya concluded by urging Canelo to reconsider his approach and focus on creating memorable matchups that would benefit both fans and the sport as a whole.