A New York-based startup, Precision Neuroscience, has reached a significant milestone with its innovative brain-computer interface (BCI) technology. The company recently announced that it received 510(k) clearance from the FDA for an electrode array designed to map brain activity. This device can be implanted for up to 30 days, marking a breakthrough in next-generation wireless BCI development. Competing against prominent players like Neuralink and Synchron, Precision Neuroscience aims to revolutionize how neural data is collected and utilized.
In a remarkable advancement, Precision Neuroscience's Layer 7 Cortical Interface was cleared by the FDA for extended use. This ultra-thin microelectrode array sits on the cerebral cortex, the outermost layer of the brain, and requires only a minor incision in the skull for insertion. Trials began in June 2023, involving 37 patients, where the device was temporarily placed to assist surgeons, such as in tumor removal procedures. With this new clearance, the implant can now remain in place for up to 30 days, enabling the company to market the technology for intraoperative brain mapping and gather high-resolution neural data.
This repository of neural information will help train algorithms integral to BCIs, potentially allowing users to control robotic limbs or other devices through thought alone. CEO Michael Mager highlighted the rapid progress since the company’s inception in 2021, emphasizing their self-managed manufacturing facility. Notably, Benjamin Rapoport, a neurosurgeon and founding member of Neuralink, co-founded Precision Neuroscience. Meanwhile, competitors like Neuralink and Synchron continue their own advancements, with Neuralink having implanted devices in three patients and Synchron sharing positive one-year clinical trial results.
From a journalist's perspective, this development underscores the rapid pace of innovation in neuroscience and technology. The ability to map brain activity over extended periods opens doors for transformative medical applications, offering hope to individuals with paralysis or other mobility impairments. It also raises ethical questions about privacy and consent in neural data usage, prompting further dialogue on the responsible integration of such technologies into society.