The landscape of college football has undergone significant changes, particularly with the introduction of Name, Image, Likeness (NIL) compensation and the transfer portal. These innovations have reshaped the student-athlete experience, prompting discussions on regulation and organization. Prospects at the recent NFL Scouting Combine shared their thoughts on these changes as they prepare for their professional careers. Many agreed that while NIL and the transfer portal offer opportunities, they also require better management to ensure fairness and focus remain on the sport.

Evolving Regulations for NIL Compensation

The introduction of NIL compensation has brought unprecedented financial opportunities for student-athletes. However, many prospects feel that this system needs refinement. Former Michigan edge Josaiah Stewart highlighted the need for more structured guidelines to prevent excessive departures and unregulated payments. Tight end CJ Dippre echoed similar sentiments, expressing concerns about the disparity in earnings and its impact on team dynamics. Both athletes believe that stricter regulations could help maintain a balanced playing field.

As NIL compensation continues to evolve, there is growing consensus among players that oversight is necessary. The new NCAA revenue-sharing model set to begin in July aims to address some of these issues. Schools will be able to pay student-athletes directly through revenue sharing, up to approximately $20.5 million annually. Additionally, third-party deals exceeding $600 from school-affiliated boosters or collectives will require approval from a new NIL clearinghouse. This entity will verify the authenticity of NIL deals using fair market value, curbing fraudulent compensation agreements. Players like Alabama safety Malachi Moore acknowledge the current state of flux but see potential benefits in the forthcoming regulations.

Reforming the Transfer Portal and Gameplay Rules

The transfer portal has become an integral part of college football, offering athletes more flexibility in their careers. However, some players suggest implementing restrictions to prevent overuse. Michigan tight end Colston Loveland proposed limiting the number of times an athlete can enter the portal, emphasizing the importance of commitment and learning from challenges. Despite its drawbacks, the portal remains valuable for athletes seeking new opportunities to thrive.

Changes in gameplay rules are another area of interest for draft prospects. Ohio State safety Lathan Ransom suggested adjusting the timing of playoff games to provide more preparation time for the combine, especially for those involved in championship runs. Arkansas receiver Andrew Armstrong advocated for adopting an NFL rule that allows players to get up and continue running if they fall without being touched by an opponent. These adjustments aim to enhance both player development and game excitement, ensuring a smoother transition into professional football.