On average, the share of committed work a team delivers within a sprint or a release cycle is a key metric. Our research reveals ten essential capabilities for driving delivery predictability, with organizational process factors playing a significant role. For instance, a streamlined tech stack means the engineering team doesn't have to rely on a separate operations team to manually provision servers. Iterative and automated controls, along with self-serve environments provisioning, significantly reduce the likelihood of these activities delaying delivery. When risk, compliance, and audit controls are automated and team members can self-provision environments, delivery predictability improves.
Having dedicated team members who don't depend on other teams or functions allows for better capacity prioritization within a single team. Teams can then focus on delivering committed work without dealing with dependencies or resource bottlenecks. Moreover, when teams remain persistent for three to six months with 100 percent dedicated members who don't "context switch" between projects, their work estimates become more consistent, and their velocity and throughput enhance.
In product development, driving business value should be the primary decision-making metric. Our research shows that technology factors play a meaningful role in improving value realization, which is defined as the share of committed business value that is delivered. For example, when organizations start allocating budgets to products instead of projects, the gap between commitment and delivery narrows. Agile funding shifts the focus from optimizing for budget, time, and scope to prioritizing fixed-capacity teams and measurable business outcomes.
Making decisions on work planning and budgeting at the product level enables teams to better meet their commitments and adjust their efforts according to market or other conditions. Effective product managers, who are business leaders with the mindset and technical skills to guide multiple product teams simultaneously, shape product strategy, define requirements, and ensure delivery quality.
Maximizing employee satisfaction scores (ESS) is crucial as it is linked to various organizational benefits. When organizations recognize individual expertise, provide career progression options, and base promotions on capabilities, employees become more engaged and satisfied. Standardizing and reducing the overall number of roles helps create a balanced ratio of orchestrators to doers, increasing team capacity without hiring more employees.
Automating routine tasks such as environment provisioning, compliance, operations, and testing activities also improves employee satisfaction. Freed from administrative tasks, team members can focus on building new functionalities and features, which is more fulfilling professionally and personally. Advanced automation enables incremental releases and A/B testing of new features, allowing teams to deliver functionality to users more quickly and reducing stress associated with large, infrequent deployments.
Organizing product delivery around specific value metrics like user journeys or customer segments helps teams achieve measurable business outcomes. When teams work towards a collective goal, they can see the product's ultimate impact, improving overall employee satisfaction.
We naturally expect a positive relationship between automation and each subdimension of team effectiveness. Interestingly, agile funding and product management also significantly impact each subdimension. Combined with automation, these forces bring clarity, accountability, and a shared purpose to product teams. When teams are trusted to make autonomous decisions, they can better estimate their deliverables and create more value for the business. A product-based journey requires leadership commitment to invest in individuals and help each team member build their capabilities. Empowered teams are effective teams.