In the world of tennis, there has been a heated debate regarding the playing levels of Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz compared to the iconic trio of Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Novak Djokovic. Former world No 1 Mats Wilander sparked this discussion by claiming that Sinner and Alcaraz have reached new heights in the last couple of years, stepping into the void left by the now-retired Federer and Nadal, with Djokovic also in the final phase of his career.

Wilander's Perspective: A Spectacular Show

Wilander believes that "Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner put on such a great, entertaining show." He emphasizes that every time they play, there is suspense and entertainment. The matches can go in any direction, and neither player is intimidated by the other. Momentum changes occur, but they don't last long. Wilander further states that they are following in the footsteps of the Big 3 in terms of level. He hopes that Roger, Novak, and Rafa are not listening but admits that when Sinner and Alcaraz are at their best, there is no way anyone has ever played better tennis. 2: Wilander's words highlight the unique qualities of Sinner and Alcaraz. Their ability to keep the audience on the edge of their seats and produce unpredictable matches is truly remarkable. It shows that they have the potential to become legends in their own right.

Fritz's Insights: Unprecedented Pace

Current world No 4 Taylor Fritz backs up Wilander's claims by suggesting that Sinner and Alcaraz are hitting the ball with more pace than the Big 3. Fritz notes that their defence is incredible, and when they are on the run in the corners, they crush the ball. He compares their lateral baseline points to those of Nadal and Federer, stating that when Sinner and Alcaraz do it corner to corner, they are hitting the ball ten miles an hour faster. This shows their exceptional power and speed on the court. 2: Fritz's observations provide valuable insights into the playing styles of Sinner and Alcaraz. Their ability to generate such high levels of pace is a testament to their talent and hard work. It sets them apart from the previous generation of players.

Monfils' Verdict: A Wait-and-See Approach

Former world No 6 Gael Monfils has given his verdict on the matter. He acknowledges that Jannik had an incredible year and Carlos as well, but emphasizes that they need to give it time. These guys are still young, and comparisons with the Big 3 should be made with caution. Monfils believes that in five or ten years, comparisons will be easier. He also points out that Carlos is only 21 and comparing him to a 37-year-old Novak, who has won so many Slams, is tough. 2: Monfils' approach is a sensible one. It shows that we should not rush to judgment and give these young players time to develop and make their mark. Their potential is undeniable, but it will take time to determine if they can truly match the legends.

Chardy's Dismissal: A Premature Claim

French Davis Cup winner Jeremy Chardy dismisses the notion that Sinner and Alcaraz are already playing at a higher level. He played against these guys many times in his career and knows their talent. Chardy believes that at the moment, they have had a good start to their careers but cannot be compared to Roger, Rafa, and Novak yet. He prefers not to compare eras and suggests that in ten years, we can make a more accurate assessment. 2: Chardy's words bring a sense of realism to the discussion. It is important to recognize the achievements of the current generation while also respecting the legacy of the Big 3. Only time will tell if Sinner and Alcaraz can reach the same heights.