The College Football Playoff (CFP) held an eight-hour meeting at the Grand Hyatt DFW Airport, where commissioners discussed potential changes to the 2025 seeding process and future expansion. Although no decisions were finalized, participants reported productive discussions. The focus was on reviewing the 2024-25 season's performance, including ticketing, TV viewership, and improving playoff segments. Commissioners plan to meet again in March after analyzing historical data to inform their decisions.
Debates centered on whether to maintain the current system of awarding top-four seeds to the highest-ranked conference champions or adopt a straight seeding approach. Additionally, discussions touched upon expanding the playoff to 12, 14, or 16 teams, with varying implications for different conferences. Commissioners aim to ensure fair access while considering competitive and financial impacts.
Reviewing the Current System for 2025
Leaders are evaluating the effectiveness of the existing CFP format, particularly the seeding rules for the upcoming 2025 season. A key concern is whether to continue providing automatic top-four seeds and first-round byes to the highest-ranked conference champions. This system offers significant advantages but may not always reflect the best competitive balance. Before making any changes, commissioners will review detailed data from previous seasons.
Rich Clark, the CFP executive director, emphasized that the majority of the meeting focused on assessing the past season's performance. Ticket sales, television ratings, and the dynamics of on-campus games were scrutinized to identify areas for improvement. While the current system has its merits, there is always room for enhancement. The goal is to optimize every stage of the playoff, from quarterfinals to the championship game. Commissioners acknowledged that some adjustments might be necessary to ensure fairness and competitiveness. They will analyze data over the next few months to make informed decisions by March.
Exploring Future Expansion Possibilities
Beyond the immediate concerns for 2025, discussions also ventured into potential long-term changes for the CFP. Commissioners considered various models for expanding the playoff, including options for 12, 14, or 16 teams. Each model presents unique challenges and opportunities, especially regarding access and representation for different conferences. The ACC and Big 12, for instance, have expressed interest in maintaining their current advantages but remain open to exploring alternatives.
Jim Phillips, ACC commissioner, and Brett Yormark, Big 12 commissioner, highlighted the importance of thorough analysis before making any substantial changes. They emphasized the need to consider the broader impact on college football as a whole. While expanding the playoff could increase competition and fan engagement, it also raises questions about the financial and logistical implications. Commissioners will continue to gather input and evaluate models to determine the best path forward. The ultimate goal is to create a format that benefits all stakeholders and enhances the overall experience for players, coaches, and fans alike.