The future of the College Football Playoff (CFP) format is under review as stakeholders assess its inaugural year. Despite a meeting held by the CFP board of managers, no immediate changes have been decided upon. The discussions are still in their early stages, with conference commissioners beginning to explore potential modifications. Unanimous approval from all members of the CFP board, which includes 10 FBS conference commissioners and Notre Dame's athletic director, would be required for any alterations to take effect.

Concerns over the current structure emerged after some lower-ranked teams received favorable matchups in the quarterfinals. For instance, the fifth and sixth-ranked teams, Texas and Penn State, faced easier opponents compared to the top-seeded teams. This led to unexpected outcomes, including the loss of all four teams that had earned first-round byes. These results sparked debates about the fairness and effectiveness of the existing format. While some commissioners acknowledge the need for discussion, they also express caution, emphasizing that one year's worth of data may not be sufficient to warrant significant changes.

Moving forward, the conversation around the CFP format will likely continue as stakeholders weigh the benefits and drawbacks of maintaining or modifying the system. Ensuring competitive balance while preserving financial incentives remains a key consideration. Ultimately, the goal is to create a tournament structure that promotes fairness and enhances the overall experience for both players and fans alike.