Key Points in the Lawsuit
Background and Filing Details
On Wednesday, December 4th, Churchill Downs Incorporated and the New York Racing Association jointly filed a lawsuit in Western Kentucky Federal Court. The suit highlights their contention that they are being overcharged by the Horse Racing Integrity and Safety Authority. This move has sparked significant attention within the racing industry.They argue that the fees imposed on them are unjust and do not align with the original agreements. The refusal of Churchill Downs Incorporated to make a nearly $2 million payment led to this legal action.
HISA's Perspective
In a statement, HISA countered by stating that both Churchill Downs Incorporated and NYRA have benefited greatly from HISA's uniform safety rules, expertise, and oversight, especially over the past two years. HISA emphasizes that uniformity must extend to cost assessments as well. To do otherwise would be unfair to other tracks and industry participants who are paying their fair share.HISA will continue to uphold the standards of the sport with integrity and fairness for all racing participants. Their mission is clear, and they will not allow any parties to pick and choose which rules they follow. Every racetrack, including CDI and NYRA, must operate under the same paradigm. No one is exempt.
Churchill Downs' Response
A spokesperson for Churchill Downs Incorporated said, "We are deeply disappointed to be put in a position where we must file a lawsuit to protect our rights. The actions undertaken by HISA are grossly inconsistent with the law and our constitutional rights." This statement reflects the company's stance and the gravity of the situation.Churchill Downs believes that they are being treated unfairly and that their rights as a track owner are being violated. The lawsuit is a last resort to seek justice and ensure that the fees charged are reasonable and in line with the law.