In a first for CFP history, the complete 12-team bracket was prematurely revealed before the live announcement. Brett McMurphy of the Action Network tweeted that SMU would claim the final spot over Alabama, and this prediction turned out to be accurate. The fallout from this leak has been intense, especially for Crimson Tide supporters who were left disappointed.
CFP Director Rich Clark was furious about the situation and made it clear that those involved had betrayed the process. He confirmed that an investigation is underway to determine the source of the leak. Only a select group, including the selection committee, ESPN, and CFP staff, had early access to this sensitive information.
The stakes are high for the CFP to maintain trust and transparency in its selection process. This breach has cast a shadow over the playoff reveal, and many are wondering if it will lead to changes in how rankings are handled and communicated in the future. The investigation is ongoing, and fans and teams alike are eagerly awaiting the results.
Selection committee chair Warde Manuel provided insight into the SMU-over-Alabama decision. He highlighted key factors such as SMU's undefeated conference record and Alabama's loss to unranked opponents. Manuel admitted that it was a tough debate, but the committee ultimately felt that SMU's overall performance gave them the edge.
This leak not only disrupted the integrity of the CFP selection process but also sparked broader conversations about transparency and fairness in college football. As the CFP addresses the fallout, it will be crucial to ensure that similar incidents do not occur in the future and that the process remains fair and transparent for all involved.
The first-round of the College Football Playoff is set to begin on Friday, December 20, and Saturday, December 21. Fans and teams will be watching closely to see how the CFP handles this situation and what changes, if any, result from this incident.